# CSS Poly Fluid Sizing using calc(), vw, breakpoints and linear equations

When working with creative designers on web page designs, it’s fairly common to receive multiple Sketch or Photoshop artboards/layouts, one for each breakpoint.

In that design, elements (like an `h1`

heading) will usually be different sizes at each breakpoint. For example:

- The
`h1`

at the small layout could be`22px`

- The
`h1`

at the medium layout could be`24px`

- The
`h1`

at the large layout could be`34px`

The bare minimum CSS for this uses media queries:

`h1 {`

font-size: 22px;

}

@media (min-width:576px) {

h1 {

font-size: 22px;

}

}

@media (min-width:768px) {

h1 {

font-size: 24px;

}

}

@media (min-width:992px) {

h1 {

font-size: 34px;

}

}

This is good, but it’s a little bit jolting when you resize your browser window. At each breakpoint, the text size instantly jumps up/down in size. It would be great if the resizing of fonts between layouts was completely fluid. Your layout is fluid. Why not your `font-sizes`

too? You could throw in a CSS transition to smooth out that jump:

`h1 {`

font-size: 22px;

transition: font-size 0.2s;

}

It’s not so jarring now, but the jump is still clearly there. What else can we do?

# Viewports Units to the rescue?

Viewport units are a step in the right direction. They allow your text to fluidly resize with your layouts. And the browser support is great these days.

*But *the viability of Viewport units is *very dependent* on the original creative designs for a web page. It would be great to just set your `font-size`

using `vw`

and be done:

`h1 {`

font-size: 2vw;

}

But this only works if your creative art-boards take this into account. Did the designer choose a text size that was exactly 2% of the width of each of his art-boards? Of course not. Let’s calculate what the `vw`

value would need to be for each of our breakpoints:

`22px`

size @ `576px`

wide = 22/576 = 3.82% of the width`24px`

size @ `768px`

wide = 24/768 = 3.13% of the width`34px`

size @ `992px`

wide = 34/992 = 3.43% of the width

They are close but they aren’t all the same. So you would still need to use media queries to transition between text sizes but there would still be jumps. And consider this weird side-effect:

@ 767px, 3.82% of the viewport width is 29px. Resizing your browser 1-pixel wider and the

`font-size`

suddendrops back down to 24px. That would be weird.

So how do we solve this problem?

# Statistical Linear Regression?

Wait. What? Yes, this is an article about CSS, but some basic math can go a long way towards an elegant solution to our problem.

First, lets plot our resolutions and corresponding text sizes on a graph:

Here you can see a scatter plot of the designer’s specified text sizes at the defined viewport widths. See that line? That‘s’ called a *trendline*. It’s sort of a way for you to find an interpolated `font-size`

value for any viewport width, based on the data we provided.

**The trendline is the key to all of this**

If you could set your `font-size`

according to this trendline, you would have an h1 that smoothly scales on all resolutions that would come close to matching what the designer intended. First, let’s look at the math. The straight line is defined by this equation:

- m = slope
- b = the y-intercept.
- x = the current viewport width
- y = the resulting
`font-size`

The are several methods for determining the slope and y-intercept. A common method is the Least Squares fit:

Once you run those calculations, you have your trendline equation.

# How do I use this in CSS?

Okay, this is getting pretty heavy on the math. How do I actually use this stuff in front-end web development? The answer is CSS `calc()`

! Once again, a fairly new CSS technology that is very well supported

You can use the trendline equation like this:

`h1 {`

font-size: calc({slope}*100vw + {y-intercept}px);

}

Once you find your slope and y-intercept you just plug them in and Viola!

Note: You have to multiply the slope by

`100`

since you are using it as a`vw`

unit which is 1/100th of the Viewport width.

# Can this be automated?

I ported the least squares fit method into an easy-to-use SASS function:

Does this really work? Open up this CodePen and resize your browser window. **It works!** The font sizes are fairly close to what the original design was asking for and they smoothly scale with your layout.

Now, admittedly, it’s not perfect. The values are close to the original design but not quite perfect. This is because a linear trendline is an **approximation** of specific font sizes at specific viewport widths. This is inherit of linear regression. There is always some error in your results. It’s a trade-off of simplicity vs. accuracy.

Also, the more varied out your text sizes are, the more error that will be in your trendline. Can we do better than this?

# Polynomial Least Squares Fit

In order to get a more accurate trendline, you need to look at more advanced topics, like a polynomial regression trendline that might look something like this:

Now *that* is more like it! Much more accurate than our straight line. A basic polynomial regression equation looks like this:

The more accurate you want your curve, the more complicated the equation gets. **Unfortunately, you can’t do this in CSS.** `calc()`

simply cannot do this type of advanced math. Specifically, you can’t calculate exponents:

`font-size: calc(3vw * 3vw); /* This doesn't work in CSS */`

So until `calc()`

supports this type of non-linear math, we are stuck with **linear equations only**. Is there anything else we can do to improve upon this?

# Breakpoints + Multiple Linear Equations

What if we were only calculating a straight line between each pair of breakpoints? Something like this:

So in this example we would calculate the straight line between `22px`

and `24px`

and then another time between `24px`

and `34px`

. The SASS would look like this:

// SCSSh1 {

@media (min-width:576px) {

font-size: calc(???);

}

@media (min-width:768px) {

font-size: calc(???);

}

}

We could use the least squares fit method for those `calc()`

values but since it’s just a straight line between 2 points, the math could be greatly simplified. Remember the equation for a straight line?

Since we are talking about just 2 points now, finding the slope (m) and y-intercept (b) is trivial:

Here is a SASS function for this:

Now, just use the linear interpolation function on multiple breakpoints in your SASS. Also, lets throw in some min and max `font-sizes`

:

// SCSSh1 {

// Minimum font-size

font-size: 22px; // Font-size between 576 - 768

@media (min-width:576px) {

$map: (576px: 22px, 768px: 24px);

font-size: linear-interpolation($map);

} // Font-size between 768 - 992

@media (min-width:768px) {

$map: (768px: 24px, 992px: 34px);

font-size: linear-interpolation($map);

} // Maximum font-size

@media (min-width:992px) {

font-size: 34px;

}

}

And it generates this CSS:

`h1 {`

font-size: 22px;

}

@media (min-width: 576px) {

h1 {

font-size: calc(1.04166667vw + 16px);

}

}

@media (min-width: 768px) {

h1 {

font-size: calc(4.46428571vw - 10.28571429px);

}

}

@media (min-width: 992px) {

h1 {

font-size: 34px;

}

}

# The Holy Grail of CSS sizing?

Lets wrap this all up in a nice SASS mixin (for the lazy and efficient!). I’m coining this method: ** Poly Fluid Sizing**:

This SASS mixin requires the following SASS functions

First of all, obviously this method applies not only to `font-size`

but to any unit/length property (`margin`

, `padding`

, etc). You pass the desired property name into the mixin as a string.

Next, you pass any number of mapped viewport width + size value pairs **in any order** into the `poly-fluid-sizing()`

mixin. *It will automatically sort the map according to Viewport width from lowest to highest*. So you could pass a crazy map like this to it and it would work out just fine:

`h1 {`

$map: (576px: 22px, 320px: 18px, 992px: 34px, 768px: 24px);

@include poly-fluid-sizing('font-size', $map);

}

It will then perform linear interpolation on each pair of viewport widths and then generate your CSS. You can import this into any SASS project and easily utilize it. Here is a final CodePen of this method:

The only downside that I’m seeing at the moment is that you can’t throw mixed units into the mixin, for example `3em`

@ `576px`

width. SASS just won’t really know what to do mathematically there. I’m going to continue to think about a way to handle that short of passing in a base `em`

value into it.

# Conclusion

Is this the best we can do? Is Poly Fluid Sizing the Holy Grail of fluid unit sizing in CSS? Maybe. If Non-linear, Polynomial Regression were possible using `calc()`

that might be better. But maybe not… depends on whether you want linear scaling or not.

CSS currently supports non-linear animation and transition timing functions, so maybe there is a chance that `calc()`

will also support it someday.

I began exploring this idea in early 2017 and eventually developed the above solution. Since then, I’ve seen a few dev’s come up with similar ideas and different pieces of this puzzle. I thought it was time for me to share my method and how I got there.

Here are some of those references: